Skip to content

I guess you had to be there – advice on developing a learning strategy

September 15, 2010

Yesterday on Twitter, I saw this brief exchange between @JaneBozarth and @Dave_Ferguson, both of whom are consistently witty (and informative) in 140 characters.  It made me chuckle out loud and my daughter shouted “what are you laughing at?” to which I replied “oh nothing, just something kind of funny on Twitter”. 

What I found really interesting when I thought about that a little was that this is a micro-example of the contextual nature of learning and I guess of social learning in particular.  You might read this and interpret this as an exchange between a couple of users, but since you don’t see what they tweet about all day/every day, you might not know if this was a tongue-in-cheek exchange or a huffy one.   And, if you were taking it literally – you’d wonder if Dave is asking for clarification on the process.

As we see more learning move into the informal world, I think a lot of our learning is going to be  increasingly contextual.  More situations of I guess you had to be there to make sense of it or learn.

This poses a timely question for me for a couple of practical reasons. 

  1. Dan Pontefract has been invited to do a talk at TEDxUBC (FastForward Education) and is looking for some input from his readers through his blog (check out the post and make a comment).   I have a keen interest in the (r)evolution of the education system, most of which I think is too content-centric and not context-centric.  We spend too much time trying to fill people’s heads with more knowledge and not enough time helping them figure out what to do with it.  We don’t teach kids skills, we tell them stuff.  I am looking forward to what Dan puts together and while I’d really love to see it in person, at least I can look forward to the video. 
  2. Secondly, I am putting together a webinar series called Training Innovations for people who are in HR type roles and are responsible for “training” within their organizations.  One of the big things that the participants have asked for is guidance on developing a training strategy.  How can an organization develop a training strategy with the contextual in center stage?  It isn’t purely about technology, although that would be a big help.  I don’t think leaving things wide open for people to figure it all out for themselves is the solution either.   I think there needs to be some kind of balance in organizations between what is formal learning and informal.  Whether that is unique to each organization or if there is a decision-tree based on size, industry, location, etc…(hmmm, that would be helpful, but unlikely anyone built one of these already?)  What kind of scaffolding is needed to help learning strategy developers include the contextual for their organization?  I am starting with the model I wrote about earlier (Am I peddling frustration?), which focuses on the “stocks” part of the equation, and in reading Harold Jarche’s comments and subsequently beginning to read the Power of Pull, I recognize that creating an environment where serendipity can occur is critical (Abandon Stocks, Embrace Flows).

Do you have suggestions?

As an aside, I also noted that Dave writes about context on his blog and Jane has recently published a book on Social Media for Trainers, which I have not read (sorry Jane) but seems to have a ton of practical ways to work contextually.

Advertisements
3 Comments leave one →
  1. September 15, 2010 11:39 am

    Holly,

    You’re so right about the contextual nature. Jane and I have never met in person, but we’ve read each other’s blogs, participated in the #lrnchat discussion, and (obviously) tweeted back and forth.

    I actually thought about tossing in an emoticon, though I’m slightly biased against them for my own use. Offhand, I suppose I thought the playful nature of Jane’s first remark was such that anyone who saw that would figure out I wasn’t too serious.

    However — only people who follow both me and Jane saw my reply (that’s what happens when you start a tweet with @name), which slightly reduced the chance for people misconstruing.

    Serendipitously, we both seem to have been thinking about online presence today; my own post muses vaguely about how we go about connecting at first (and go about not trying to scare folks off).

  2. September 15, 2010 9:47 pm

    Thanks for the props Holly … maybe I can get you in. I’ll check into it.

    Think “The Fall of the Ber-learning Wall” … that’s my rant sneak peek.

Trackbacks

  1. Tweets that mention I guess you had to be there – advice on developing a learning strategy « Spark Your Interest! -- Topsy.com

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: